Tag Archives: Sugar

Sugar Shock?

Yogurt

Yogurt (Photo credit: jess2284)

Sugar can be hidden in a lot of processed food products that make health claims.  Yogurt is one of them.

When I see the yogurt aisle in the supermarket, I am amazed at all the different types available now.  This slideshow gives us some guidance on the various types to choose.  Here’s where label reading is a necessity.  Some people think that yogurt is healthy and most are, but notice the grams of sugar (some can be quite high) and the grams of protein (which often differ considerably).

This is a start on some different choices if you want to choose yogurt as a dairy alternative protein source.

CLICK HERE.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sugar Facts

mom, i need more high fructose corn syrup!

mom, i need more high fructose corn syrup! (Photo credit: tbone_sandwich)

FYI:  In 1900, the average American consumed 5 lbs of sugar per year; now it’s 150 lbs/year with 61 pounds from high fructose corn syrup (HFCS). The facts speak for themselves.

CLICK HERE.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sugar Blues

Public relations of high-fructose corn syrup

Public relations of high-fructose corn syrup (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Could sugar be a villain in our diabesity epidemic?    In the past few decades, dietary fat has taken the sole blame – but now views are shifting toward sugar as a major contributor.

Now new research from UC Davis suggests that sugar in the form of sugary drinks contribute not only to obesity but also to heart disease risk.  After eating a sugar-free diet for several weeks, volunteers drank three concoctions a day of a sugary drink containing high fructose corn syrup (55% fructose, 45% sucrose) for two weeks.  They agreed to be monitored in the hospital with their food carefully measured, their bodies subjected to scans and blood tests.   This protocol added 500 calories of added sugar a day  to their diets or about 25% of all calories.

About 1 in 4 Americans gets at least 200 calories a day from sugary drinks.  Many children are getting 300 calories a day or more from sugar-containing drinks.  Sodas are not the only culprit – an 8 oz. glass of fruit punch or apple juice has nearly 130 calories.  The same amount of chocolate milk contains more than 200 calories.

The results were somewhat surprising – within the two weeks, their blood chemistry changed for the worse – in other words, the volunteers had elevated levels of LDL cholesterol, a risk factor for heart disease.

In addition, two large epidemiological studies with both men and women have found that  Sugar-sweetened drinks were linked with adverse changes in levels of HDL, triglycerides and C-reactive protein.   C-reactive protein is  marker for inflammation.

Not surprisingly, the American Beverage Association (ABA), a trade organization, has disputed these studies.

CLICK HERE for how the sugar industry promoted its product through deceptive ads beginning in the 1930s.  Follow the obesity timeline on the historical role of changes in our food supply that may  have contributed to our current health problems.

Enhanced by Zemanta

No to Corn Sugar!

Sugar

Sugar (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It’s about time that the FDA denied the Corn Refiner’s request to rename high fructose corn syrup, corn sugar.

CLICK HERE.

The combined total of naturally occurring sugars and added sugars appears on the food labels in the line reading “sugars”.  On a label’s ingredients list, the term sugar means sucrose.  Added sugars and syrups are added to a food for any purpose to add sweetness or bulk or in browning (baked goods).

Look for other names on ingredient labels  like corn syrup, dextrose, evaporated cane juice, galactose, glucose invert sugar,  lactose, maltose, sucrose, molasses, levulose (an older name for fructose), and concentrated fruit juice sweetener.

It is also helpful to remember there are added sugars in common processed foods:

1/2 cup canned corn = 3 tsp. sugar

12 oz. cola = 8 tsp. sugar

1 tablespoon ketchup = 1 tsp. sugar

1 tablespoon creamer = 2 tsp. sugar

8 oz. sweetened yogurt = 7 tsp. sugar

2 oz. chocolate = 8 tsp. sugar

The American Heart Association has specific guidelines for added sugar — no more than 100 calories a day from added sugar for most women and no more than 150 calories a day for most men. That’s about 6 teaspoons of added sugar for women and 9 for men.

Most Americans get more than 22 teaspoons — or 355 calories — of added sugar a day, which far exceeds USDA guidelines and American Heart Association recommendations.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sugar Sense?

oatmeal with strawberries, sugar-free chocolat...

oatmeal with strawberries, sugar-free chocolate syrup, & sugar-free chocolate chips (Photo credit: Newbirth35)

This article by David L.  Katz, MD is a great take and sensible approach on our obsession with demonizing common foods (in this case, sugar) and blaming them for disease rates.   I am not a fan of sugar and never had a “sweet” tooth, so it’s easy for me keep away from it.  Besides, a lower carbohydrate diet treats me well in terms of keeping triglycerides low, LDL cholesterol at bay, and increasing HDL cholesterol. I also think that excess sugar is not doing any of us very much good.  But, enough is enough – low fat, low saturated fat, no fat, no HFCS, less sodium, no cholesterol, sugar-free, fat-free, gluten-free, trans-free, no soy, no wheat?   Where will it end and what will be left to eat?

Although, some studies have reported some metabolic differences with fructose, it still is found in fruits and fruits are a healthy carbohydrate that gives us many vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals.   Let’s not get carried away.

CLICK HERE.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Should Sugar Be Regulated?

Sugar sugar

Sugar sugar (Photo credit: dhammza)

Sugar has become the new villain in our diets.  Some very reputable researchers tell us that sugar is “toxic”.   Should sugar be taxed?  Certainly prohibition does not work.  Here is a very reasonable assessment on the topic of sugar regulation.  Click here.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/01/health/opinion-regulate-sugar-alcohol/index.html?hpt=hp_bn10

Enhanced by Zemanta

Giving Up On Sugar?

Macro photograph of a pile of sugar (saccharose)

Image via Wikipedia

A new report from Columbia University predicts if current trends continue, half of Americans will be obese- not merely overweight – by 2030, based on a BMI of over 30. The age group most affected would be those reaching their 40s and 50s where the prevalence of obesity could reach 60%.  This dire prediction will certainly add to the nation’s health care costs due to increased heart disease and stroke risks.

A new report from the CDC and Emory University says U.S. consumption of added sugars has dropped when compared to data from 1999-2000.  Sugary soda consumption showed the greatest decline, but energy drinks increased in popularity.  Nonetheless, another report points out that half the U.S. population over age 2 drink at least one sugary beverage every day, and 70% of boys aged 2 to 19 drink sugary beverages daily.  Surprisingly, 57% of the sugary drinks are consumed at home rather than from restaurants.

In a 5-year study of 4,166 people aged 45-84, middle-aged women who drank two or more sugary drinks a day were close to four times as likely to have high levels of blood fats as triglycerides and impaired blood sugar levels when compared with women who drank less than one sugar-sweetened beverage a day.

Women who drank two or more sodas a day also had more belly fat, but not necessarily more weight. The same effects were not seen with men and the reasons for this are not yet clear.

The implications of this study are that drinking sugary drinks may be helping to contribute to metabolic syndrome.  Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions — increased blood pressure, a high blood sugar level, excess body fat around the waist or abnormal cholesterol and triglyceride levels — that occur together, increasing your risk of heart disease, stroke and diabetes. A high degree of belly fat is more dangerous and increases health risks since it lies deep inside and can produce hormones that negatively affect blood pressure, cholesterol, and insulin production.

Compared to other more difficult lifestyle changes, e.g. increasing exercise or eating more vegetables, cutting back on sugar-sweetened drinks should be relatively simple.  However it may seem easier said  than done.

Sugary soda is found almost everywhere you look – in vending machines, fast food and other restaurants – they are part of our culture. They can become habit-forming and can lead to withdrawal symptoms for some – if you find yourself thinking that drinking just one soda a day is not acceptable, you may have a serious soda habit.  Nutrition experts continually say that any food can be part of any diet if consumed in moderation, but sodas are often not consumed in moderation like other foods or beverages.  People often do not realized how many calories are in that can of soda or for that matter how much sugar

  • There are 40.5 grams of sugar in a 12 oz can of Coke.
  • Forty grams of sugar is the equivalent of 10 teaspoons of sugar.
  • 10 teaspoons of sugar is the equivalent of 20 sugar cubes.
  • Drinking one Coke a day for a year results in the consumption of 32 pounds of sugar.
  • Drinking one Coke a day, instead of an equivalent amount of tap water, for a full year theoretically could cause you to gain 18 pounds.

So how do you go about kicking a sugar habit?

  • Make a true commitment to decrease your intake. This is true for any lifestyle change.
  • Change to diet sodas gradually.  Make small decreases in sugary soda a day and make small increases in diet soda a day. However, diet sodas have their own problems as to the safety of some artificial sweeteners and their caffeine content.
  • Give up all caffeine which some think may the addictive part of sodas.  Look for caffeine-free drinks – it may take a few weeks to truly give up the craving.

What Are Some Soda Alternatives?

Have you heard of water?  This may seem a little boring at first – no sugar or caffeine kick here.  But try some flavored waters or add some lemon. It’s fairly healthy, it’s refreshing and there are tons of choices in terms of flavors and brands. So keep water bottles ready to go in your refrigerator, and every time you leave the house, take a bottle with you.

Try Tea (Green or Black) Tea is a healthy alternative to water for people who prefer flavored beverages. Unless you have to have sweet tea, tea is calorie free and contains powerful phytochemicals like the antioxidant in green tea, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). Some are fruit flavored and caffeine-free.

You could have had a V-8 or try the new vegetable juice flavors in your supermarket, as well as fruit and vegetable juice blends. While they’re not super low in calories, each serving contains a serving of fruit and a serving of vegetable.

And then there is coffee. Coffee can be a calorie-free, flavorful alternative to soda. And you can easily find lower-caffeine coffees in coffee shops and supermarkets. But to keep coffee low-calorie, be sure to keep it simple, i.e. no Frappucinos (50+ grams of sugar).

Enhanced by Zemanta

Are Protein Bars a Healthy Choice?

Peanut butter is a semi-solid and can therefor...

Image via Wikipedia

 

The sales of protein and energy bars have skyrocketed over the last decade and the industry now is estimated to generate over a billion dollar each year. The marketing for these bars include women, men, elderly, children, and athletes.

Back in 1980 when they were introduced, their appeal was that they provided a portable quick energy source for long-distance or endurance athletes. Other claims made were that these bars helped to build muscle due to its relatively high protein content.

Protein needs can be met by simply eating a balance of protein throughout the day.  Most of us do not need that much protein, for example, a person who weighs 150 pounds only needs about 54 grams of protein a day.  That amount can easily be met by eating a bran cereal with milk in the morning (15 grams), a turkey and cheese sandwich for lunch (30 grams), and chicken breast with brown rice for dinner (30 grams).  That adds up to 75 grams which is more than enough for most people.

What advantage could a protein bar provide?  Portability and convenience is a plus, but another choice could easily be a peanut butter (PB) sandwich that also meets this criteria. Neither needs refrigeration and can travel everywhere.

Compare two fairly comparable choices:

Peanut butter sandwich (1 T. on 2 slices of whole-wheat bread.)

Calories: 234

Protein: 9 grams

Total Carb: 29 grams

Total Fat: 11 grams

Saturated Fat: 2 grams

Sugars (tsp): <1

Fiber: 5 grams

Cost: 25 cents

Clif Luna  (Nutz over Chocolate)

Calories: 180

Protein: 9 grams

Total Carb: 24 grams

Total Fat: 6 grams

Saturated Fat: 2.5 grams

Sugars (tsp): 3

Fiber: 4 grams

Cost: $1.40

Which one is the better choice? On average, the PB sandwich is a bargain compared to many of these bars that cost more $2.50 each. Some bars provide up to 7 grams of saturated fat and some can contain up to 7 teaspoons of sugar. The bars with the most sugar tend to have the least fiber.

It’s so important to compare the nutrient fact labels on the many available bars on the market.  But next time, don’t forget the simple PB sandwich as a much less expensive as well as a healthy alternative.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sugar Shock

This is a bowl of white sugar.

Image via Wikipedia

Imagine pouring almost three-quarter of a measuring cup (31 teaspoons) of sugar onto your foods or beverages each day.  This number may be a bit lower (some estimations say 22 teaspoons to account for waste).  These estimates represent the average daily amount of added sugars (cane and beet sugars, corn sweeteners, honey and syrup) in the U.S. food supply, enough to provide for every man, woman, and child with more than 100 pounds per year. Compare this amount to how much we consumed in 1890 – only about 6 teaspoons.  The steady upward trend comes primarily from sugary soft drinks, next by cakes, pies, and other baked good, followed by sweetened fruit drinks and punches.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sugar – Is it a Cancer Villain?

Previous studies with diet and cancer focused on the influence of dietary fat primarily on breast and pancreatic cancers.   From personal experience, my own graduate research involved the effects of omega-6 and omega-3 dietary fats on breast cancer in rats. (By the way, our results showed that there was not much difference in number of tumors between the two groups – and the study was repeated with the same results.)

Not much research has been done with carbohydrates (primarily sugars) and cancer. It has been known for decades that cancer cells thrive on glucose.  Moreover, foods that cause a sharp rise in blood glucose trigger the secretion of insulin and insulin growth factor (IGF-1), two hormones that also promote cancer growth.

A study published in Cancer Research has investigated the effects of a high or low carbohydrate diet on the growth of various cancers. The researchers implanted various strains of mice with human or mouse tumor cells and assigned them one of two diets.  The first diet, a typical Western-type diet, contained about 55% carbohydrate, 23% protein and 22% fat.  The second diet contained 15% carbohydrate, 58% protein, and 26% fat.  They found that the tumor cells grew consistently slower on the second diet.

Even more dramatic was the result that mice genetically predisposed to breast cancer given the Western diet developed breast cancer within their first year of life while none on the low carbohydrate, high-protein diet did.  Only one on the Western diet reached a normal life span (about 2 years), with 70% of them dying from cancer while only 30% of those on the low-carbohydrate diet developed cancer and more than half these mice reached or exceeded their normal life span.

The lead author, Gerald Krystal, PhD, a distinguished scientist at the British Columbia Cancer Research Centre stated, “tumor cells, unlike normal cells, need significantly more glucose to grow and thrive.  Restricting carbohydrate intake can significantly limit blood glucose and insulin, a hormone that has been shown in many independent studies to promote tumor growth in both humans and mice.”

According to the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR), commenting on the study “the findings are interesting, but more research is needed before it can be used to make recommendations on public health”.  It is also important to realize that this was just one study and it was a cell study.  The findings may not necessarily be the same using animals including humans.

What kind of fuel are cancer cells particularly fond of?  It appears to be the sugar, fructose based on previous study in Cancer Research.  Fructose is found primarily in sucrose or table sugar (half of which chemically is fructose) in addition to high fructose corn syrup.  U.S. consumption of high fructose corn syrup went up 1,000 percent between 1970 and 1990, researchers reported in 2004 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

The study administered glucose or fructose to two separate sets of pancreatic cancer cells.  It was discovered that both sugars increased cancer cell growth at similar rates but the way these two types of sugars were metabolized affected cell proliferation.

According to the authors:

” Importantly, fructose and glucose metabolism are quite different… These findings show that cancer cells can readily metabolize fructose to increase proliferation.”  The study supports the old adage that sugar feeds cancer because they found that tumor cells do thrive on sugar (glucose). However, the cells used fructose for cell division, speeding up the growth and spread of the cancer.

In a nutshell, ALL forms of sugar are detrimental to health in general and may play a role in cancer promotion, but in slightly different ways, and to a different extent. Overall, fructose, however, clearly seems to be the most harmful.

The AICR additionally comments that these studies do not “prove” that adding sugar to your diet raises cancer risks.  Most dietary factors act in the promotional stage of cancer, not in the initiation stage, so their effects are not causative, but add to cancer cell growth or proliferation, once a cancer is established.  “A healthy diet will always include some sugar, as it naturally occurs in nutritious foods like fruits and milk.  The key is to limit added sugars of all types, rather than focusing on glucose versus fructose or sucrose”.

American Association for Cancer Research (2011, June 15). Low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets may reduce both tumor growth rates and cancer risk. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 25, 2011, from http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2011/06/110614115037.htm

Enhanced by Zemanta